7 results for 'cat:"Privacy" AND cat:"Class Action" AND cat:"Contract"'.
J. Freeman grants in part class certification in a privacy dispute with Google in which consumers say they were recorded without permission by Google Assistant devices. While certification on some of the privacy claims is denied due to a lack of "defined harms" on the record, certification is approved on the contract claims for consumers who purchased certain Google-made devices, such as the Google Home and Google Nest Hub.
Court: USDC Northern District of California, Judge: Freeman, Filed On: December 11, 2023, Case #: 5:19cv4286, NOS: Other Fraud - Torts - Personal Property, Categories: privacy, class Action, contract
J. Orrick allows class claims to continue against Meta from consumers who say the Meta Pixel tech allows the social media company to intercept and monetize confidential medical information. Several of the claims, such as contract and unjust enrichment claims, may proceed on grounds that Meta appears to have known about the transfer of sensitive information but did little to improve its tech's filters or show why the transfer was necessary for its advertising goals. A series of other trespass and privacy claims are tossed with a leave to amend.
Court: USDC Northern District of California, Judge: Orrick, Filed On: September 7, 2023, Case #: 3:22cv3580, NOS: Other Personal Property Damage - Torts - Personal Property, Categories: privacy, class Action, contract
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free